Anyone who applies the rule at a meeting or event should remember that it is based on trust. If trust is breached, you must prove that the breach is unacceptable. Disciplinary action must be taken against a member or guest who violates the rule, which usually results in future exclusion from activities. Is there a rule defined for “what is said in the room stays in the room” or is it simply an obligation of confidentiality with a different name? The rule originated at Chatham House in London, the headquarters of the Royal Institute of International Affairs, with the aim of providing anonymity to speakers and promoting openness and exchange of information. It was developed in 1927 and has since been refined twice (1992 and 2002). A meeting does not need to be held at Chatham House or hosted by Chatham House to be held in accordance with the rule. It can simply be called by the meeting host, who explains in advance that the meeting operates according to the Chatham House rule. We examine the origin of this widely used term and find out how it can benefit IoD members In 1927, it`s relatively easy to imagine how this rule would work in practice, but to what extent can it really work in the age of transparency and social media? Chatham House is home to the Royal Institute of International Affairs in London and chatham House Rule was established here in 1927, with subsequent revisions in 1992 and 2002. The rule, and there is only one rule and not several rules, is as follows: The main source of information for this article is the Chatham House website, which provides the context of the Chatham House Rule and its origin. Our focus and research structure are divided into important geographic regions and major topics. The Chatham House Rule is used around the world to promote inclusive and open dialogue in meetings. Q.
Is the rule used for all meetings at Chatham House?A. Not often for member events; more often for small research meetings, for example when. B work in progress is discussed or when topics are politically sensitive. Most of our conferences usually take place. Q. When was the rule developed?A. 1927 and refined in 1992 and 2002. Check out our frequently asked questions below to learn more.
(a) Neither the identity nor affiliation of the speakers or that of any other participant in such meeting may be disclosed. The Continuity Forum will not do so and all participants are required to maintain confidentiality and discretion. Meetings can be held “officially” or according to the “Chatham House Rule”. In the latter case, it may be agreed with the speaker(s) that it would be conducive to a free discussion if a particular session or part of it were strictly private. Meetings do not need to be held at Chatham House or hosted by Chatham House to be held in accordance with the rule. Quando uma reunião (ou uma parte da reunião), é governada pela a regra da Chatham House, os participantes são livres de usar a informação recebida, mas não podem divulgar a identidade e a afiliação dos oradores e dos participantes. If a meeting or part of it takes place in accordance with the Chatham House Rule, participants are free to use the information collected on that occasion, but they may not disclose the identity or affiliation of the persons who created the information, nor may they disclose the identity of other participants. F. Is the rule used for all meetings of political organizations? A.
No. However, it is common for only certain senior officials of a party or organization to be allowed to disclose the details of a party meeting to the media. Often, large meetings or regular general assemblies tend to be more open about what has been discussed. In contrast, confidentiality generally applies to board meetings, campaign planning meetings or meetings where ongoing work is discussed, or meetings where the topic is otherwise politically sensitive. It is often advisable to apply the rule when a controversial guest speaker is invited (for example. B a politician) in exchange for an open speech. The rule is designed to promote openness and information sharing at meetings on the assumption that it is simply a duty of confidentiality between stakeholders and not a formal rule like the Chatham House Rule. Q. Can I tweet under the Chatham House Rule during an event?A. The rule can be used effectively on social media sites like Twitter, provided that the person tweeting or sending messages only reports what was said at an event and does not identify – directly or indirectly – the speaker or another participant. This consideration should always guide how event information is disseminated – online and offline. The Chatham House Rule was developed by the Royal Institute of International Affairs, an independent organisation that promotes research and discussion on international affairs.
The institute is also known as “Chatham House”, which refers to its 18th century premises in the heart of London. The Chatham House building housed three British prime ministers, including William Pitt the Elder, Earl of Chatham (Prime Minister 1766-8). When the institute was founded in 1920, it acquired Chatham House as a gift in 1923 and established the Chatham House Rule in 1927. Photo — Speakers at an event raise a question. Image: Suzanne Plunkett Люди, принимающие участие во встречах, проводимых по Правилу «Четем Хауса », могут свободно использовать полученную ими информацию, но не имеют права разглашать ни имена ни место работы выступающих. For more information on the rule, see the Practice Law Practice Note, The Chatham House Rule. Although such measures are rare, the rigorous implementation of the rule is crucial to its effectiveness and to Chatham House`s reputation as a trusted place for open and free dialogue. Although this is primarily a rule of honour, it must be understood that non-compliance with the rule within the limits of the meetings of the Continuity Forum will result in the exclusion of the offending party from all subsequent meetings.
Q. Can a list of meeting participants be published?A. No – the list of participants must not be disseminated beyond the participants in the meeting. The next time you attend an event or meeting according to the Chatham House rule, remember that this does not mean that “what is said in the room stays in the room” – a common misconception. What you say can be shared as long as the person sharing it doesn`t attribute it directly or indirectly to you or your organization. Perfect and simple summary. I have attended many events that are subject to the Chatham House Rule. My comments were then quoted in minutes and proceedings and in other publications on the events, all without attribution. Participants adhere to the rule without coercion. F. Should we refer to the Chatham House Rule or the Chatham House Rules?A. There is only one rule.
The European Central Bank (ECB) sometimes adopts the Chatham House rule. In May 2015, the publication of a speech in line with the rule by Benoît Cœuré, member of the ECB`s Executive Board, led to differing opinions on its use and self-publication. Cœuré`s speech had an impact on the currency, equity and bond markets. [6] [7] [8] Subsequently, the ECB`s references to the question-and-answer rule and the opening remarks by Vice-President Vítor Constâncio and Management Board member Peter Praet drew attention to Cœuré. A member of the Governing Council, Boštjan Jazbec, also convened questions and answers in accordance with the rule during the same month. [2] William Pitt the Elder was a Whig who fought vigorously for war against other imperial powers in order to expand Britain`s commercial interests. Some attribute the creation of the British Empire to him, but his disregard for the cost of his military campaigns cost him political support at home and abroad. The reign of the Earl of Chatham created the conditions for the American quest for independence.
This includes distributing lists of meeting participants beyond meeting participants. However, you can report what you said yourself at the meeting. One of the ways to limit this task is to keep the attendance list confidential beyond the event attendees. .
